In the world of tennis, Roger Federer stands as a titan of the sport, with a career that has redefined excellence. But did you know that tennis wasn’t always Federer’s sole focus? As a child, Federer was a sporting polymath, dabbling in soccer, skiing, wrestling, swimming, basketball, handball, table tennis, badminton, and even skateboarding.

This diverse athletic background, often referred to as Federer’s “sampling period,” is believed to have contributed significantly to his exceptional tennis abilities later in life. It developed his overall physical literacy, hand-eye coordination, and adaptability.

Federer playing all sports but tennis

Federer’s early and continuous exposure to various sports helped him develop a well-rounded athletic foundation.

Sound familiar? It should. Many of us in the software development world pride ourselves on being polyglot programmers, fluent in a myriad of languages and frameworks. We’ve got our Python for machine learning, our JavaScript for the frontend, maybe some Java or even Rust on the backend, and we’re always eager to try out the latest trendy language.

But here’s the kicker: Federer didn’t become the GOAT by continuing to divide his time between ten different sports. He chose to focus on tennis.

The power of specialization

”I fear not the man who has practiced 10,000 kicks once, but I fear the man who has practiced one kick 10,000 times.”—Bruce Lee

Federer’s early diverse sporting background gave him a unique edge, but it was his laser focus on tennis that allowed him to reach unprecedented heights in the sport. The other sports are still part of Federer’s life as hobbies and cross-training, but when it comes to competition, it’s all about tennis.

Similarly, while a background in various programming languages can provide valuable insights and problem-solving approaches, true mastery and efficiency in enterprise development often come from specialization.

Enter TypeScript and Freestyle.

TypeScript: The grand slam of enterprise development

TypeScript, with its robust type system and inherent closeness to the cloud, offers a compelling solution for enterprise development. By using TypeScript across the entire stack, we can:

  1. Maintain a single mental model: No more context switching between language paradigms.
  2. Share code between frontend and backend: Types, interfaces, and utility functions can be reused effortlessly.
  3. Leverage a unified ecosystem: NPM’s vast library of packages becomes universally accessible across your project.
  4. Streamline tooling and CI/CD: One linter, one test runner, one build process to rule them all.

But how do we achieve this TypeScript nirvana, especially when it comes to traditionally non-TypeScript domains like database interactions?

Freestyle: Your center court for full-stack TypeScript

Freestyle takes the concept of full-stack TypeScript to its logical conclusion. It allows you to write your entire application—from frontend components to backend logic to database schemas—in pure TypeScript.

@cloudstate
class PlayerManagerCS {
	static id = 'player-manager' as const;
	players: PlayerCS[] = [];
	addPlayer(player: PlayerCS) {
		this.players.push(player);
	}
	findGOAT(): PlayerCS {
		if (this.players.length === 0) {
			throw new Error('No players found');
		}
		return this.players.reduce((goat, player) => {
			const goatScore = PlayerManagerCS._calculateGOATScore(goat);
			const playerScore = PlayerManagerCS._calculateGOATScore(player);
			return playerScore > goatScore ? player : goat;
		}, this.players[0]);
	}
	static _calculateGOATScore(player: PlayerCS): number {
		return (
			player.grandSlamTitles * 3 +
			player.weeksAtNumberOne +
			player.tournamentWins +
			player.yearsWithGrandSlam * 2
		);
	}
}

With Freestyle, there’s no need for an ORM or SQL queries. Your TypeScript classes and methods are seamlessly translated into efficient database operations. This isn’t just about convenience—it’s about maintaining a consistent mental model throughout your entire development process.

When calling your Freestyle methods on the client side, everything is seamlessly typed because your methods are pure TypeScript. It’s as simple as:

const playerManager = useCloud<typeof PlayerManagerCS>('player-manager');
const theGOAT: PlayerCS = await playerManager.findGOAT();
console.log(`The GOAT is ${theGOAT.name}!`); // The GOAT is Roger Federer!

Embracing the Federer approach in enterprise development

Just as Federer’s diverse sporting background informed and enhanced his tennis skills, your experience with different programming languages isn’t wasted when you focus on TypeScript. That Python data processing experience? It’ll help you write more efficient TypeScript algorithms. Your Java background? It’ll make you appreciate TypeScript’s robust typing system even more. Heck, I wrote my first line of code in Java, so you can imagine how heavenly my first move from JS to TS felt.

By adopting Freestyle and committing to a TypeScript-centric architecture, enterprise teams can:

  1. Accelerate development: Channel all your cognitive resources into mastering one powerful language.
  2. Improve code quality: Consistent typing and tooling across the entire stack reduce errors and improve maintainability.
  3. Simplify hiring and onboarding: Focus on finding and nurturing great TypeScript developers.
  4. Future-proof your codebase: As TypeScript continues to evolve and improve, your entire stack reaps the benefits.

We love cool languages, but we love winning more

Federer holding up trophy collage

Federer won 20 Grand Slam singles titles, which was the all-time record until recently surpassed by Rafael Nadal and Novak Djokovic.

As developers, we’re naturally drawn to the latest and greatest languages and frameworks. We want to experiment, learn, and push the boundaries of what’s possible. But when it comes to enterprise development, we’ve got to be pragmatic.

Let’s look at some cool features from other languages and see how TypeScript can hold its own:

Python’s list comprehensions

Python’s list comprehensions are elegant and concise:

Python
squares = [x**2 for x in range(10) if x % 2 == 0]

TypeScript can achieve similar expressiveness with array methods:

TypeScript
const squares = Array.from({ length: 10 }, (_, x) => x)
	.filter((x) => x % 2 === 0)
	.map((x) => x ** 2);

Rust’s pattern matching

Rust’s pattern matching is powerful and exhaustive:

Rust
enum TennisShot {
    Serve(u8),
    Forehand,
    Backhand,
    Volley,
}
 
fn describe_shot(shot: TennisShot) -> String {
    match shot {
        TennisShot::Serve(speed) if speed > 200 => format!("An ace at {}km/h!", speed),
        TennisShot::Serve(speed) => format!("A serve at {}km/h", speed),
        TennisShot::Forehand => "A powerful forehand!".to_string(),
        TennisShot::Backhand => "An elegant backhand!".to_string(),
        TennisShot::Volley => "A precise volley at the net!".to_string(),
    }
}

TypeScript can implement a similar concept using discriminated unions and switch statements:

TypeScript
type TennisShot =
	| { kind: 'Serve'; speed: number }
	| { kind: 'Forehand' }
	| { kind: 'Backhand' }
	| { kind: 'Volley' };
 
function describeShot(shot: TennisShot): string {
	switch (shot.kind) {
		case 'Serve':
			return shot.speed > 200 ? `An ace at ${shot.speed}km/h!` : `A serve at ${shot.speed}km/h`;
		case 'Forehand':
			return 'A powerful forehand!';
		case 'Backhand':
			return 'An elegant backhand!';
		case 'Volley':
			return 'A precise volley at the net!';
	}
}

Are these TypeScript implementations identical to their Python or Rust counterparts? No, and it would be delusional to claim they are. Each language has its unique strengths and elegance in certain areas.

However, the TypeScript versions are “good enough” for most enterprise scenarios. They’re readable, maintainable, and leverage TypeScript’s strong typing system. More importantly, they allow you to solve these problems without leaving the TypeScript ecosystem.

Just because the grass looks greener on the other side doesn’t mean we should plant our seeds all around. That’s simply not pragmatic or practical in enterprise development. With TypeScript and Freestyle, we can cultivate a lush, productive garden in one place, drawing on most strengths of other languages while maintaining the benefits of a unified stack.

After all, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, and TypeScript is more than capable of flattering Python, Rust, and other languages in the enterprise arena.

Conclusion: Serve an ace with TypeScript

In the fast-paced world of enterprise development, being a jack-of-all-trades but a master of none is no longer enough. While there’s undoubtedly value in having explored diverse programming languages, when it comes to building and maintaining large-scale applications, the focused approach offered by TypeScript and Freestyle presents a compelling case for specialization.

Roger Federer didn’t become a tennis legend by dividing his time between ten different sports. He took the skills and experiences from his diverse athletic background and channeled them into becoming the best tennis player he could be.

It’s time for enterprise development to take a page out of Federer’s playbook. Embrace your polyglot past, but focus your future. With TypeScript and Freestyle, you’re not just writing code—you’re crafting a grand slam winning career in software development.

Federer holding racket up at match

Remember, in the world of enterprise development, it’s not about how many languages you know. It’s about how effectively you can serve, volley, and ace with the one that matters most. Choose TypeScript, choose Freestyle, and let’s make every project a championship performance.

Get Updates on our Unified TypeScript Stack

Subscribe to the latest product updates, articles, and tutorials from Freestyle, a YC-backed company. Be among the first to build full-stack in just TypeScript.